{"id":1810,"date":"2023-08-09T14:34:20","date_gmt":"2023-08-09T14:34:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nehrlich.com\/linkedin\/uncategorized\/1810\/"},"modified":"2026-03-12T21:29:54","modified_gmt":"2026-03-12T21:29:54","slug":"the-raw-signal-group-newsletter-this-week-makes-the-provocative-claim-that-the-future-of-work-is-in-pieces","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nehrlich.com\/linkedin\/uncategorized\/the-raw-signal-group-newsletter-this-week-makes-the-provocative-claim-that-the-future-of-work-is-in-pieces\/","title":{"rendered":"<a href=https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/feed\/update\/urn%3Ali%3Ashare%3A7095049664445456384>The Raw Signal Group newsletter this week makes the provocative claim that &#8220;The future of work is in pieces&#8221;.<\/a>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Raw Signal Group newsletter this week makes the provocative claim that &#8220;The future of work is in pieces&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The newsletter makes the point that treating work as a binary choice between in-person vs. remote work is far too limiting. <\/p>\n<p>Yes, there&#8217;s an element of in-person collaboration and serendipity that is hard to match when working remotely, because, as they put it, &#8220;Knowledge work \u2014 aligned, sustained, creative, collaborative work \u2014 is very hard to do in pieces.&#8221; You can&#8217;t just do your part without knowing how it all fits together, and what other people are working on, and how priorities and tradeoffs are being made. <\/p>\n<p>And yes, at the same time, the convenience and flexibility of remote work is wonderful and nobody wants to give that up. As they write, &#8220;The most wonderful parts of the future of work we&#8217;ve all built over the last few years are the places where it supports that sustainability and creativity. Where giving a person more space \u2014 mental space, child-care space, time-of-day space, geographic space, no-daily-commute space \u2014 helps them put up their best work. In many cases, it is what allowed them to be part of the work at all. That&#8217;s good shit. It&#8217;s valid to want to keep it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So I like their challenge to stop thinking it&#8217;s one or the other:<br \/>\n&#8220;The silliest approach to that question is to try to make it a fight over whether the benefits of in-office alignment and collaboration are worth giving up that flexibility. Other than from an abject lack of creativity, why would you box yourself in that way?<\/p>\n<p>A far better approach is to ask, &#8220;how might we?&#8221; How do we preserve the flexibility that people value but address the isolation and scattering that piecework has created?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>How might managers and leaders communicate and coordinate differently to create the benefits of in-person collaboration while preserving the flexibility of remote work? I don&#8217;t know, but returning to what worked in the past isn&#8217;t the answer. Let&#8217;s experiment with innovative new patterns of work instead. <\/p>\n<p>What have you seen work well? What are the anti-patterns that don&#8217;t work? <\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/lnkd.in\/eAbUXC39<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Raw Signal Group newsletter this week makes the provocative claim that &#8220;The future of work is in pieces&#8221;. The newsletter makes the point that treating work as a binary choice between in-person vs. remote work is far too limiting. Yes, there&#8217;s an element of in-person collaboration and serendipity that is hard to match when&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nehrlich.com\/linkedin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nehrlich.com\/linkedin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nehrlich.com\/linkedin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nehrlich.com\/linkedin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nehrlich.com\/linkedin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1810"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/nehrlich.com\/linkedin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1810\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4486,"href":"https:\/\/nehrlich.com\/linkedin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1810\/revisions\/4486"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nehrlich.com\/linkedin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nehrlich.com\/linkedin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nehrlich.com\/linkedin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}